Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: Another blender pot convert

  1. #1
    Forum Member BigsbyTracks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Woodshed
    Posts
    755

    Another blender pot convert

    In the past I've had push-pull switches to connect the neck and bridge pickups on a Strat, but not a full-on blender pot. This week I finally realized that the no-load 250K tone pots I learned about from a Ken Fischer article years ago, which disconnect the circuit at `10', are also ideally suited to duty as blender pots. And now that I have specifically looked, I see that people have documented this repeatedly on the Web.

    Anyway, I've had my Strat set up with volume/master no-load tone/blender way for a couple of days, and it's much more ergonomic than two tone pots and a pull switch, at least for me. It was always a hassle reaching for the knob to pull up the switch, and the blender obviously gives finer-grained control of the mix. And I appreciate the bonus of having the master tone right next to the volume pot so I can do wah-like stuff on the bridge pickup now.

    Nothing really new here - just yet another instance of how frequently I find that what I `know' is constantly subject to real-world correction.
    Last edited by BigsbyTracks; 04-18-2007 at 07:12 AM. Reason: Phrasing

  2. #2
    Forum Member bluesjuke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bluesland, Texas
    Posts
    180

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    They've got me interested too.

  3. #3
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    13

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    Funny you mention this I just did this to my backup strat this weekend and I loved the outcome. I am doing it to my main axe this week as soon as the 2 new pickguards come in without the hole that I drilled for the old bridge/neck toggle :)

    Also I have seen people add a push pull pot to run the bridge/middle pickups in series or parallel which on some PU combos sounds great (enough that I tried it) and gives you a welfare humbucker thing, but I use a hotter bridge pickup and it sounded like crap on my guitar.

  4. #4
    Forum Member Erock_Germany's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    The Western Part of Germany
    Posts
    1,474

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    Hey, I just rebuilt a Strat and had a full Callaham pickguard with Lindy Fralins made and took the blender pot option. This is the cats meow. It is so easy to use and get into the habit of introducing into your tone. It is awesome.

    It is even better than the G&L setup which is Volume, trebble, bass.

    All my Strats will have the blender in the future!!!!!
    "Sorry" - John Belushi as he smashed a guitar in Animal House

  5. #5
    Gravity Jim
    Guest

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    I did mine because of all the talk on this forum, and it's da bomb diggity. Strats should come from the factory wired this way.

  6. #6
    Forum Member BigsbyTracks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Woodshed
    Posts
    755

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    Yep, I guess sometimes those trendy mods you read about on the Interweb are worth looking into!

  7. #7
    Forum Member BigsbyTracks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Woodshed
    Posts
    755

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    Hmm... here's where a no-load tone pot could actually prove to be a disadvantage. Since it's out of the circuit at 10, it doesn't interact with the volume pot most of the time, no matter which lug it's connected to. So I have a resistor/cap treble bleed to retain some highs.

    Open and natural sounds good though... I might give that wiring a shot with a conventional tone pot, next time I take the guitar apart. Thanks Fezz!

  8. #8
    Forum Member Kap'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Where phony hippies meet
    Posts
    19,769

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    The no-load tone pot on current Fenders ends up being the blend knob. It works perfectly.
    Several guitars in different colors
    Things to make them fuzzy
    Things to make them louder
    orange picks

  9. #9
    Forum Member NTBluesGuitar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    5,820

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    Quote Originally Posted by fezz parka View Post
    ...No need for a cap/resistor treble bleed if wired this way, and you'll have a much more open and natural sounding guitar.
    I'll have to look into this. I have the treble bleed on my blender/no-load setup now...might give it a whirl soon.
    "...pray do not imagine that those who make the noise are the only inhabitants of the field;
    that, of course, they are many in number; or that, after all, they are other than the little,
    shriveled, meagre, hopping, though loud and troublesome, insects of the hour."

    -Edmund Burke

  10. #10
    Forum Member Don's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    11,299

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    Quote Originally Posted by fezz parka View Post
    I've done this to my Strats for along time. There's one special thing is the drawing below that really makes it worth doing: moving the wire that goes to the tone pot from the outside lug to the middle lug. No need for a cap/resistor treble bleed if wired this way, and you'll have a much more open and natural sounding guitar.

    I recommend this mod to ever Strat owner I meet.

  11. #11
    Forum Member BigsbyTracks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Woodshed
    Posts
    755

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    Quote Originally Posted by Kap'n View Post
    The no-load tone pot on current Fenders ends up being the blend knob. It works perfectly.
    To be clear, I started out with two no-load tone pots and used one for the blender and one for a master tone. I'm not familiar with the current Fender wiring scheme - is one pot a no-load and the other one is loading?

    **EDIT** never mind, answered my own question - no-load `Delta Tone' for the bridge/middle tone pot is indeed ideal.

    Regardless, it's hard to argue with the prospect of perfection, particularly when recommended by the likes of you heavyweights. I'm definitely going to try the Fezz-approved wiring, down to a loading 250K pot for the master tone.

    ... and in the spirit of what I said in the first post, once again reality has slapped what I `know' on the upside of the head.
    Last edited by BigsbyTracks; 04-18-2007 at 11:04 PM. Reason: Grammar

  12. #12
    Forum Member BigsbyTracks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Woodshed
    Posts
    755

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    Well, the deed is done; I picked up a 250K CTS pot this afternoon, replaced the no-load master tone pot and moved the tone pot connection from the hot lug to the wiper. Thanks for the counsel, guys.

  13. #13
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    6

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    How and would you want to do this with an HSS Strat?

    Bill

  14. #14
    Forum Member BigsbyTracks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Woodshed
    Posts
    755

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    Quote Originally Posted by LongT View Post
    How and would you want to do this with an HSS Strat?

    Bill
    The basic wiring approach should be the same. Mixing a humbucker and a neck single coil would sound a little different than two singles, but probably in the same sort of way that the middle+bridge combination sounds different with a humbucker already. If you have a coil tap on the bridge you would probably get a little closer to the sweet tangy neck+bridge Tele sound.

    So, I'm not really saying much here... this wiring is pretty easy to try, so give it a shot and see if you like it!

  15. #15
    Forum Member BigsbyTracks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Woodshed
    Posts
    755

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    Speaking of wiring, with the Fezz-approved tone control wiring and no treble bleed resistor/cap, I find that most of the volume change is between 7 and 10; by 5 the guitar signal is quite low.

    Do you all prefer that sort of taper? The taper with the treble bleed was somewhat smoother due to the resistor between the hot lug and the wiper. On the other hand, with a gain pedal it's kind of useful to have a fairly wide range of low volume adjustment - `whisper' between 3-7, and `roar' between 7-10.

    I know that if I don't like the taper there are plenty of options, I'm just stepping back a moment to consider before I change anything. It's always something...

  16. #16
    Forum Member Kap'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Where phony hippies meet
    Posts
    19,769

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    The taper doesn't bother me at all. I never even really thought about it. I just sort of turn until it sounds good.
    Several guitars in different colors
    Things to make them fuzzy
    Things to make them louder
    orange picks

  17. #17
    Forum Member BigsbyTracks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Woodshed
    Posts
    755

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    Interesting about the Strat vs. Tele difference. I imagine it's not a matter of the construction of the pot - for a given manufacturer and set of specs, the pots probably all use the same track assembly whether the shaft is solid or split. That doesn't leave much variance other than the differences in Strat/Tele pickup construction. Hmm...

    One reason I notice the taper difference is that it proved a little harder to get a smooth steel-guitar volume swell effect, due to the volume bump. If I find I care enough, I will hunt down a volume pot that gives me a suitable taper.

  18. #18
    Gravity Jim
    Guest

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    It doesn't do that at all on my Strat... but I use EMG SVs, and the pot values are much different... 25K audio taper pots (250 and 500k pots don't work with EMGs). I don't know enough about the circuit to know if that's the difference, but my Fezz-wired Strat has a very smooth volume taper from 10 to 1.

  19. #19
    Forum Member BigsbyTracks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Woodshed
    Posts
    755

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    Yeah, an active circuit like the EMG's would probably work a little differently, since the impedances are a lot lower. It sounds like the 25K pot they recommend is well suited to the job!

    Last night I tried a 220K taper resistor without a treble bypass cap. That smoothed the taper but at the same time made the overall tone a little darker and created some unexpected subtle tone changes as the volume pot traveled. I suppose those were always there, but overshadowed by the treble bleed before. Since a pot with a taper resistor is a more complex resistive network than a simple pot, I guess there is no free lunch here.

    Today I ordered some Weber 30% taper solid shaft amp pots and also some 10% taper split knurled shaft guitar pots. My idea is to swap parts around to create a 30% taper pot with a split knurled shaft. We'll see how that works.
    Last edited by BigsbyTracks; 04-28-2007 at 08:26 PM.

  20. #20
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    the Netherlands
    Posts
    133

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    Did some copy / pasting:



    Same blendermod, but with pushpullpot to ad a dummycoil in series with the (nonRWRP pickupset) Would this work?

  21. #21
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    184

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    What cap values are you guys using with this setup?

    The Fralin Diagram (Fezz's Post which noone ever gave credit to...) shows an odd 0.002? I'm assuming the std 0.047uF is still good?

    Someone needs to draw up a current detailed schematic, one that's easy to understand and leaves no questions to be asked. I have Cadd is someone wants to rought it out.

  22. #22
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    184

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    Is there a significant difference? Twice the value there....

    I started using 0.015uF in the neck position of my LP's and it made a significant difference in opening up that neck tone. But that's going in the opposite direction than here.

  23. #23
    Forum Member BigsbyTracks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Woodshed
    Posts
    755

    Re: Another blender pot convert

    Quote Originally Posted by bigsbytracks
    Today I ordered some Weber 30% taper solid shaft amp pots and also some 10% taper split knurled shaft guitar pots. My idea is to swap parts around to create a 30% taper pot with a split knurled shaft. We'll see how that works.
    My pots arrived today. The shaft is firmly attached to the wiper and bushing so you can't separate the parts and swap tracks around. So much for my brilliant idea.

    Now, this is in no way a complaint about Ted's pots, since he certainly does not advertise them as having surgically alterable components.

    About caps, It has been a long time since I've used anything bigger than a .022. Perhaps that's another piece of unlearning to do.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •